Sunday, June 21, 2015

Coal, Wind or Solar??

Which is best for the environment?? Coal or Wind and Solar!!




A Scarcity of Rare Earth Minerals Is Hindering Green Technologies!!

Let's talk about where Wind and Solar come from and indeed most of our electronic everyday appliances.  Wind and Solar are not clean or green or renewable. They are toxic to our environment.

We bet the anti coal lobbyists have not thought about this?? What will they do when the Rare Earth Minerals run out??  And, it does not take a rocket scientist to figure that out!! They will run out!! More reason to keep coal as our major energy source for now and well into the future!!

A shortage of "rare earth" minerals, used in everything from electric car batteries to solar panels to wind turbines, is hampering the growth of renewable energy technologies.

With the global push to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, it’s ironic that several energy- or resource-saving technologies aren’t being used to the fullest simply because we don’t have enough raw materials to make them.

For example, says Alex King, director of the new Critical Materials Institute, every wind farm has a few turbines standing idle because their fragile gearboxes have broken down. They can be fixed, of course, but that takes time – and meanwhile wind power isn’t being gathered. Now you can make a more reliable wind turbine that doesn’t need a gearbox at all, King points out, but you need a truckload of so-called "rare earth" metals to do it, and there simply isn't the supply.

The move toward new and better technologies — from smart phones to electric cars — means an ever-increasing demand for exotic metals that are scarce thanks to both geology and politics. Thin, cheap solar panels need tellurium, which makes up a scant 0.0000001 percent of the earth’s crust, making it three times rarer than gold. High-performance batteries need lithium, which is only easily extracted from briny pools in the Andes. In 2011, the average price of 'rare earth' metals shot up by as much as 750 percent. Platinum, needed as a catalyst in fuel cells that turn hydrogen into energy, comes almost exclusively from South Africa.

Read More here:  Scarcity of Rare Earth Minerals

*****

Rare earth metals are quite often toxic to the environment too!!  It is such a shame that people who back wind and solar in this country are somehow blinded by that fact.  They have the hide to run down the coal industry and call it toxic.  Wind and Solar far outweigh coal in toxicity to the environment.  Remember, COAL is just plants turned to carbon over millions of years being compacted under the ground.  The Co2 that is released from coal is Co2 that was in the atmosphere millions of years ago.  Millions of years ago Co2 was much higher in the atmosphere then it is today. Did all life on Earth die off because of this??  No, life actually flourished, otherwise we would not be here today. So, when an anti coal arlarmist says that Co2 is catastrophically warming the Earth, they are lying. Just look back in time and the FACTS will tell the truth. Such a shame that so many scientists and politicians have been caught up in this climate hoax.  We think maybe the all important funding dollar is what drives scientists to fudge the truth and, well, politicians , who trusts them to tell the truth. They only care about taxing the pants off us.

Climate and the Carboniferous Period








*****

Some interesting articles below about Rare Earth minerals which are required for most of our electronic appliances, wind turbines and solar panels. How hypocritical are the anti coal lobbyists to demonize coal , when the very products they rely on everyday are so much more toxic to the environment.

*****

'Clean', 'green' solar & wind components rely on Rare Earth minerals from China who supply 96% of supply?

Here is the green future!

Such an intensive mining operation has a definite impact on the surrounding environment. According to the Chinese Society of Rare Earths, 9,600 to 12,000 cubic meters (340,000 to 420,000 cubic feet) of waste gas—containing dust concentrate, hydrofluoric acid, sulfur dioxide, and sulfuric acid—are released with every ton of rare metals that are mined. Approximately 75 cubic meters (2,600 cubic feet) of acidic wastewater, plus about a ton of radioactive waste residue are also produced.

Source: Nasa


*****


Wind energy is not nearly as “clean” and “good for the environment” as the wind lobbyists want you to believe. The wind industry is dependent on rare earth minerals imported from China, the procurement of which results in staggering environmental damages. As one environmentalist told the Daily Mail, “There’s not one step of the rare earth mining process that is not disastrous for the environment.” That the destruction is mostly unseen and far-flung does not make it any less damaging.

Source: Canada Free Press


     The lake of toxic waste at Baotou, China, which has been dumped by the rare earth processing plants in the background



*****


In China , the true cost of the Green Wind power experiment.

Pollution on a disastrous scale.

The toxic lake poisons Chinese farmers, their children and their land. It is what's left behind after making the magnets for the latest wind turbines... and, as a special Live investigation reveals, is merely one of a multitude of environmental sins committed in the name of our new green Jerusalem.

Source: Ninemsn

    Villagers Su Bairen, 69, and Yan Man Jia Hong, 74, stand on the edge of the toxic lake in Baotou, China that has devastated their farmland and ruined the health of the people in their community

*****

Boom in Mining Rare Earths Poses Mounting Toxic Risks

The mining of rare earth metals, used in everything from smart phones to wind turbines, has long been dominated by China. But as mining of these key elements spreads to countries like Malaysia and Brazil, scientists warn of the dangers of the toxic and radioactive waste generated by the mines and processing plants.

Independent studies chart the industry’s global ecological fallout. But no country has as many rare earths processing plants, and their attendant environmental problems, as China. Last year, China’s State Council A half-century of rare earths mining in China has caused serious environmental problems. reported that the country’s rare earths operations are causing “increasingly significant” environmental problems. A half century of rare earths mining and processing has “severely damaged surface vegetation, caused soil erosion, pollution, and acidification, and reduced or even eliminated food crop output,” the council reported, adding that Chinese rare earths plants typically produce wastewater with a “high concentration” of radioactive residues.

Source: Yale University

The Lynas plant in Malaysia is set to become the world's largest processing facility of rare earths.


*****


It is also interesting to note, that to make solar panels and wind turbines you need coal. Coal is also not just used for energy production, there are a variety of uses of coal that a lot of people would not know about. So, to demonize coal and to say it should stay in the ground is ridiculous. We rely on coal for our everyday life. There is no substitute for it. Think about that !!!

WHAT IS COAL USED FOR?

Coal has many important uses worldwide. The most significant uses of coal are in electricity generation, steel production, cement manufacturing and as a liquid fuel. Around 6.6 billion tonnes of hard coal were used worldwide last year and 1 billion tonnes of brown coal.

Different types of coal have different uses. Steam coal - also known as thermal coal - is mainly used in power generation. Coking coal - also known as metallurgical coal - is mainly used in steel production.

Other important users of coal include alumina refineries, paper manufacturers, and the chemical and pharmaceutical industries. Several chemical products can be produced from the by-products of coal. Refined coal tar is used in the manufacture of chemicals, such as creosote oil, naphthalene, phenol, and benzene.

Ammonia gas recovered from coke ovens is used to manufacture ammonia salts, nitric acid and agricultural fertilisers. Thousands of different products have coal or coal by-products as components: soap, aspirins, solvents, dyes, plastics and fibres, such as rayon and nylon. Coal is also an essential ingredient in the production of specialist products:

Activated carbon - used in filters for water and air purification and in kidney dialysis machines.

Carbon fibre - an extremely strong but light weight reinforcement material used in construction, mountain bikes and tennis rackets.

Silicon metal - used to produce silicones and silanes, which are in turn used to make lubricants, water repellents, resins, cosmetics, hair shampoos and toothpastes.

Source:  World Coal Association




*****

So, the next time you hear someone running down the coal industry - Ask them if they use cosmetics?? Do they use shampoo and toothpaste?? Do they drive a car or ride a bike?? Do they take aspirin or use plastics and soap.  If they say Yes. Then tell them that we will still need coal for a long time into the future.  Until we can find a viable alternative to coal, at this very moment in time, there simply is not one!!

***********************************************************************************

This is where WIND and SOLAR come from: Think about that next time you think of clean green renewable energy!!




Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Shipping and the Great Barrier Reef


In the news recently a Chinese coal ship captain was arrested for sailing through part of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park without a pilot.  

Ofcourse, the usual anti coal activist organizations were quick to jump on this with their scaremongering of supposedly hundreds more coal ships going through the reef. An example below from the Greenpeace Australia Facebook page.


 

What, they don't bother to tell their followers , is that many ships use the waters of the Marine Park , not just coal ships.  How do these people think that their goods like fuel, food and clothing get delivered to Queensland. Many cargo ships come into the country via the Great Barrier Reef bringing all sorts of goods.  There are also Cruise ships going up and down the coastline on a regular basis. Fuel ships, live cattle ships, naval ships and fishing vessels to name a few.

And, as the population grows , more ships will use the waters to travel through.



Interesting Facts.
Much of the prosperity of the communities in central and north Queensland, as well as the Australian economy, is based on the mining and agriculture industry, whose products by necessity must travel through Queensland’s ports.
Access to Queensland ports requires ships to travel through environmentally sensitive areas such as the Great Barrier Reef, Torres Strait and the Coral Sea. As such, it is essential for the survival of regional communities and the Australian economy that these shipping routes remain open and available to shipping on an equitable and sustainable basis.
Commodities shipped through the Great Barrier Reef region include metal ores, coal, bauxite, liquefied natural gas, sugar, timber, oil, chemicals, live cattle and general cargo.
Source: AMSA
http://amsa.gov.au/


What the anti coal activist organizations also forget to mention is that there is a very good monitoring system in place to keep an eye on all shipping activities within the Reef waters.

REEFVTS is like air traffic control but for the waters. If it was not for this service the coal ship mentioned in the article above could very well have run aground on the reef. This is proof that the monitoring system is working well.  

Ship groundings have substantially decreased since REEFVTS has been in operation,

Everyone probably remembers that in 2010 the Shen Neng 1 ran aground in an area that was not covered by the REEFVTS.  After that incident the tracking area was increased to cover the whole of the Great Barrier Reef marine waters. The map below shows the area now covered by REEFVTS.



For more information about REEFVTS please check out the links below:














Sunday, February 15, 2015

AN OPEN LETTER TO ALL CONCERNED


HELP SUPPORT INDUSTRY AND FUTURE JOB PROSPECTS


We are asking for all Australian residents who are concerned for their future job prospects and the future of our economy to please take the time to look and see what is happening in our area right now!!



THE BATTLE OF GALILEE 



By building a high profile public campaign to disrupt and delay the Galilee Basin coal mines, anti coal activists are trying to significantly increase investor uncertainty while undermining political support. 


This in turn may result in less Government subsidies for the projects, and/or stricter approval conditions, by further driving up costs and increasing risks. Extensive delays may also make the projects run foul of a changing global coal investment environment.

If you have not seen this document before, please take the time to read it.

Stopping the Australian Coal Export Boom - Funding proposal for the Australian anti-coal movement.


The coal port at Abbot Point is located not far from the World Heritage listed Great Barrier Reef, the anti coal activists have used this opportunity for alliance building with scientists and the tourism and fishing industries. These groups have been used to show their concern for the dredging project.

They have also used the reef as an emotional lever with the general public by making claims of ‘dredging on the reef’ and ‘dumping on the reef’. Which ofcourse is not true!!  The reef is nowhere near  where the dredging will take place.

In September, 2014 the then Queensland Government delivered a new proposal that included onshore disposal of dredged spoil.  Due to the close proximity of the Caley Valley Wetlands to the port land.  The new catch cry was "don't dump on the wetlands".

Unfortunately, beautiful photos of either the Nulla Creek approximately 5kms from the disposal site or aerial views of Stewarts Creek which is in the opposite direction have been splashed all over social media. Neither of these places would have had dredge spoil “dumped” there.

Instead, dredged spoil would have been pumped into carefully constructed ponds which would have been built on less than 3% of the wetlands area. The wetlands would have been protected from future development by way of legislation known as the Nature Conservation Act. 

We were hoping that the new incoming Labor Government would continue to support the port and wetlands proposal as well.  Unfortunately, they decided against the LNP plan and have now gone with a new disposal site within the port limits. We are still waiting on approval for this site.

If you support these projects please join the residents of North Queensland by fighting back against this anti coal campaign.

If you would like to help us, please join the facebook group, Bowen and Surrounds Needs and Wants the Abbot Point Expansion.

For more information regarding the Abbot Point Expansion and associated rail and mine infrastructure please check out our facts pages.
https://www.facebook.com/AbbotPointDredgingMythsandFacts

Regards,
Members of The Abbot Point Expansion Supporters Group











Whether you love coal or hate it, the fact is, it will be around for along time yet.  Until, a better , cleaner , cheaper form of energy is found to compete with coal, we will continue to use it to give energy to countries who are crying out just to be able to flick a switch!!


It is also vital that we keep coal going in this country as it is one of our biggest export earners. Without it, Australia would be in dire straights!!  

We don't have another export earner that could replace coal, not now or in the future.  Just think about this - the anti coal activist organizations want to kill the coal industry and keep all coal in the ground so we would have to go to so-called renewable energy.  We don't export wind or solar out of the country, so, how can that industry carry on from coal with export earnings??  There would be millions of export dollars lost and thousands and thousands of jobs lost.

Don't let the anti coal activist organizations win with their deceitful lies.  They have no answers for the future.  






Sunday, January 25, 2015

The Multi Cargo Facility - Abbot Point

Last time when Labor was in power in Queensland they had huge plans for the Abbot Point Coal Terminal.  It would have been the largest coal terminal in the world.

The Multi Cargo Facility would  include 12 shipping berths, a tug harbour and a dredged access channel, swing basin and berth pockets. 

Under the proposal, all dredged material from construction, approximately 25 million cubic metres, will become reclaimed land so it does not have to be disposed out to sea.

BACKGROUND: 

The project also includes a 70-metre wide construction haul road and port access road linking the harbour development to the Abbot Point State Development Area. 
The proposed road would cross the Caley Valley Wetlands but would be located near an existing water pipeline to the Abbot Point Coal Terminal to reduce impacts. 
The MCF will likely be developed in two stages. 

Stage one will comprise: 
• construction of a bunded reclamation 
• dredging of an access channel, swing basin and berths 
• development of up to six berths 
• development of a tug harbour 
• development of the transport access corridor. 

Stage two would extend the bunded area and include another six berths. 

Source: Queensland Government


Artists impression of what the facility would look like on completion:



More interesting photos of the Multi Cargo Facility. What might have been.......






However, when the LNP got into power they drastically reduced the Multi Cargo proposal stating that it was “unrealistic and undeliverable”.

The AU$9 billion expansion would have increased the capacity of the terminal from 50 million to 385 million tonnes per annum with the facility expanded to accommodate nine coal terminals, making it one of the largest coal ports in the world.
“The significant scale, complexity and potential impacts of the proposed infrastructure are extensive and it would be many years before the whole of the planned additional capacity would realistically be warranted,” Seeney said in a statement.
Under revised plans, a second and third terminal will still be built at the site located in the north of Queensland State.
“The proposals outlined by the (previous Labor) government were unrealistic and undeliverable. They were never going to come to reality,” added Seeney.
“Our focus on (terminal 2 and terminal 3) is a more practical and efficient approach to expansion of infrastructure at Abbot Point.”

Source: Port Technology


The Greens are going on about not wanting another Gladstone fiasco for Abbot Point. Well, this is the reality of what Labor wanted. 

The Fight for the Reef campaign recently posted on Facebook this picture below, blaming the LNP for wanting to do this to Abbot Point just like what happened at Gladstone.  In fact, they are lying, as usual.  This is not what is proposed by the LNP government. This is more like what was proposed by Labor. Compare the pictures of the Multi Cargo facility and Gladstone below.

Gladstone dredging and reclamation.


The proposal for the wetlands disposal is in settling ponds with lined walls. On land, not reclamation like the above photo at Gladstone.

The Green groups campaign is full of misleading information.



Compared with Reality , the LNP plan for Abbot Point...






Media Statements

Deputy Premier, Minister for State Development, Infrastructure and Planning

The Honourable Jeff Seeney



Wednesday, September 17, 2014



Port strategy a win-win for environment and economy

North Queensland families have heard firsthand how the Queensland Government will help protect the Great Barrier Reef through a strategy to use dredge material from port development on land, rather than conventional sea-based disposal methods.

Deputy Premier and Minister for State Development, Infrastructure and Planning Jeff Seeney told a public meeting in Bowen that the Abbot Point Beneficial Reuse Strategy would protect the natural wonder and allow for the sustainable development of the port.

“Our Government believes this landmark plan offers the strongest and most exciting opportunity yet to achieve a win-win for the environment and economic growth,” Mr Seeney said.

“We are delivering on our election promise to provide better planning and infrastructure and open up the resource-rich Galilee Basin.

“Labor had no long term plan for the region, the reef or development.

“Our strategy will strike a balance between protecting the unique values of the Great Barrier Reef and boosting regional economies.

“My trip to the port and the opportunity to address North Queenslanders in support of port development has reinforced for me that we cannot miss this chance to create jobs and economic opportunities across the region and the entire state.

“The Queensland Government will continue to support communities like Bowen build a strong future through growth in the tourism, resources and agriculture pillars of their economy.”

The Abbot Point Beneficial Reuse Strategy was launched last week and involves dredge material being placed on existing state land to the west of current port facilities, to lay the groundwork for future expansion. Existing man-made wetlands to the south will be enhanced by the creation of a habitat three times the size of the current wetlands.

“We aim to create a port facility that will serve Queensland industry for the next century and, at the same time, triple the area of existing freshwater wetland to support local flora and fauna,” he said.

“The State Government has appointed experienced project manager, Michael Schaumburg, to oversee this development, with work set to commence as soon as possible should Federal Government approval be granted.”

Mr Seeney said the Abbot Point Beneficial Reuse Strategy would be carried out in stages and consist of a series of enhanced land areas, linked to a low-impact single rail line development and sedimentation ponds to return seawater to marine wetlands.

“We are determined to make the right, long-term planning decisions for this port now, in the same way planning for the successful Port of Brisbane began decades ago," he said.

“I look forward to working with Queensland Environment Minister Andrew Powell and Commonwealth Minister Greg Hunt to implement this strategy in time for the commencement of dredging in March 2015.”

[ENDS] 17 September 2014



Now, due to Legal challenges the proposal has been downsized even further. For more information on the proposal and any changes please visit the Department of State Development , Infrastructure and Planning website.

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning














Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Facts versus Lies

Let's put a few things into perspective. The Greens are never happy. They did not want dumping in the ocean waters. They got their wish. 

Now they don't want dumping at the wetlands. They are never happy.  And, now it seems they have hoodwinked the Qld Labor party into believing their lies. The Labor party have stated that if they get into power they will not allow dumping in the wetlands. AMCS Media release

Now, blind Freddy can clearly see that the disposal in ponds with lined walls in the proposed reclamation sites at the wetlands will have no impact on any surrounding areas. Why are Labor so fooled by the Greens?? Yes, that's right. They only care about getting back into power. Even if it means lying to the people of Queensland to do it.

This photo below is one of the photos that is circulated everywhere on social media. It is in fact the Nulla Creek. Which by the way is about 5 klms away from the proposed dump site. How can the Greens get away with scaremongering like this.  They make out with their pretty little picture of water lilies and crystal clear water that this is where the spoil is going. Wrong!!




This is the Nulla Creek in the dry season. It is like this most of the year!!




This is the proposed area for the dredged spoil to go.  Nowhere near the Nulla Creek.   It is going in one of these reclamation areas below. This is the Kaili Valley Wetlands (Caley Valley) in their true form and how it looks most of the year.



Here are some more photos of the wetlands.  You never see the Greens spreading these photos around do you??  Makes you wonder why, doesn't it.  Could it be that they would not get so many to support their ridiculous claims, and would miss out on all those wonderful donations to "Save the Reef".











Abbot Point Dredging and Onshore Placement of Dredged Material Project

The Queensland Government has identified the Abbot Point Dredging and Onshore Placement of Dredge Material Project, as the first opportunity to utilise the enabling infrastructure developed under the Abbot Point Port and Wetland Project, as an alternative to the (approved) offshore disposal within the Great Barrier Reef MarinePark of dredging associated with terminals T0 and T3. The Abbot Point Dredging and Onshore Placement of Dredged Material Project consists of dredging approximately 1.7 million m3 of seabed for the purpose of ship berth pockets and aprons to support the development of facilities for coal export terminals T0 and T3. Dredging will be undertaken using a Cutter Section Dredger. The dredged material will be pumped via pipeline to the onshore dredge material management areas. Material placed within the dredged material management areas will be managed until completion of the dredging and preliminary settlement. A return water pipeline will take excess water from the dredge material management areas to a sub-tidal location, between 4 m and 10 m water depth, near the Abbot Point headland.





The Abbot Point and Wetland Project is located adjacent to the existing port area within the declared Abbot Point State Development Area. This project primarily consists of the construction of embankments to create primary and secondary dredge material management areas within a beneficial reuse area. It also includes the construction of three sections of a rail embankment that will support the future expansion of the North Galilee Basin Rail Project. The dredge material management areas will be designed to receive, settle and store dredge material, prior to beneficial reuse for land improvement in the Abbot Point State Development Area.



The very small area of the wetlands that will be used is approximately 2 - 3%  The rest will be enhanced.









For more information regarding the Wetland proposal please visit here : Abbot Point Port and Wetlands strategy