Friday, May 23, 2014

How Social Media has been used to spread HYSTERIA!!

Greenpeace, WWF , Fight for the Reef and various other Green organizations and groups have been waging a war on the fossil fuel industry.  All in the name of so called Global Warming which they now call Climate Change!!  Using the Dredging at Abbot Point as their tool in their fight against COAL!! Most of the information you see on the internet are full of lies and scaremongering. 

The power of social media reaches far and wide.  All over the world people are up in arms about a tiny dredging campaign at a 30 year old Coal Terminal. A coal terminal which has dredged many times before with no scientific proof of any damage done to any of the surrounding environment!! The sediment from this dredging is far less than the sediment that travels out of our massive river systems every year when they flood!!

Lets go over some of the absolutely amazing lies and scaremongering spread by these so called Green groups.




With photos like this doing the rounds , how can you blame people for being misled. "Dumping on the Reef."  The reef is not being dumped on. The dredged spoil is being deposited about 40kilometres away from the reef!! The seabed floor which is mainly sand , silt and clay is being picked up from one area near the Abbot Point terminal and deposited in an area of similar seabed. No seagrass or reef anywhere near where the spoil will be deposited.   Dr Brett Kettle who has experience in dredging has stated that the effects would be flat out extending 10 kilometres from the dredging site!!  







 Stop Dredgers Tearing up the Reef!! "Don't Dredge Our Reef"  The Reef is not being dredged. The dredging is taking place at Abbot Point, near the mainland of Australia, the Reef is about 40 kilometres away!! Photos like the above are being put up all over the internet to gain public support to stop the dredging at Abbot Point. Would you join them if you saw a misleading photo like this?? Ofcourse you would.  This is the problem, telling mistruths to gain support. 


_______________________________________________________________________________





A coal ship super highway?? Really!! The above picture makes it seem like the reef will be used as an industrial zone and ships will be using it as a super highway. When in fact, the reef itself is nowhere near any industry. No industries will be built on the Reef!!  There is a designated shipping lane for all ships to use through the Great Barrier Reef.   Not just for coal ships, but for all types of ships, such as Cruise Ships, ships used for exporting and importing goods to and from Australia.  Once again, a misleading photo to shock people into thinking something that is totally not true!!

___________________________________________________________________________________











If you look at the above google image of where Stone Island is situated in relation to Abbot Point, you will then realize how impossible that any dredge sediment could ever make its way around the corner to the island!! For that matter , if sediment did travel that far it would have been all over the beaches of Bowen. I can tell you right now , there has never been sediment washing up on the beaches.  


________________________________________________________________________________




Talking about sediment, brings up this very misleading photo.  Saying that dredge spoil can travel up to 80km!!  More half truths with no scientific proof. They took this from a GBRMPA report.  The GBRMPA itself released an interpretive statement to accompany the report that says the risk assessments in the study were for comparative purposes only and could not be used to access the impact of a particular project!!

The interpretive report said "Due to budget and timeframe constraints, and the technical challenges posed by the large spatial coverage and the extended period for simulation, it was necessary to make a number of simplifying assumptions. Some of the assumptions do not reflect real conditions, leading to a lack of allignment with existing field measurements!!
If the spoil did travel up to 80 km then every time Abbot Point dredged previously, the beaches of Bowen and surrounding areas would have been covered with washed up sediment. No documented evidence of that ever happening.  Below is the link to the interpretive statement from GBRMPA.




_______________________________________________________________________________



The photo above did the rounds awhile ago when the dredging was first approved.  It was actually a photo of dredging of the Dubai Palm Islands off the coast of the United Arab Emirates in the Persian Gulf.   The comments posted below the photo are typical of the scaremongering and uneducated posts from people who know nothing about dredging.

Very misleading photo.  The dredging in the above photo used the rainbowing technique to disperse the dredged material. The dredging at Abbot Point will use a trailing suction hopper dredger. The dredged spoil will be sucked up using a suction pipe that is lowered to the seabed floor, it will then be taken to where it is to be dispersed.  The doors will open at the bottom of the dredger and the dredged material will be dispersed, most of it will sink straight to the bottom. 

Below is a video explaining the techniques. Remembering, that rainbowing will not be used at Abbot Point.

  

________________________________________________________________________________



These are just a sample of some of the misleading photos doing the rounds.  Ofcourse, there have been so many more. A point to remember:  just because you see a picture on a computer screen, it does not always mean that it is a true representation of what is actually happening!!










Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Coal Industry Under Attack

Stopping the Australian Coal Export Boom

Greenpeace Australia plans to disrupt and delay coal export projects in the country in a campaign to stop the booming sector. In a leaked report obtained from Greenpeace it clearly states exactly how they plan to do this.


Their strategy in the report is to "disrupt and delay" key projects and infrastructure while gradually eroding public and political support for the industry and continually building the power to win more.


There are 6 elements to this strategy:
 
1.  Disrupt and delay key infrastructure
 
     Challenge and delay key infrastructure developments (ports and
     rail) and ‘mega mines’.

 
2.  Constrain the space for mining.
 
     Build on the outrage created by coal seam gas to win federal
     and state based reforms to exclude mining from key areas,
     such as farmland, nature refuges, aquifers, and near homes.
     Landowners locking the gate.

 
3.   Increase investor risk
 
      Create uncertainty and a heightened perception of risk over coal
      investments.

 
4.   Increase costs
 
      Increasing the cost of coal is fundamental to the long-term global
      strategy to phase out the industry. We can start to remove the
      massive subsidies to the coal industry, and to internalize the
      ‘externalized’ costs of coal.

 
5.   Withdraw the social license of the coal industry
 
      Change the story of coal from being the backbone of our
      economy, to being a destructive industry that destroys the
      landscape and communities, corrupts our democracy, and
      threatens the global climate. 

 
6.   Build a powerful movement
 
      Create stronger networks and alliances and build the power
      necessary to win larger victories over time.





Activist checklist 2 years on


 
Queensland Resources Council Chief Executive Michael Roche released a checklist of coordinated activism aimed at shutting down Queensland’s export coal and gas industries.


Sunday, May 11, 2014

Dredging Wrongly Blamed for Damaging the Reef

One of the misconceptions going around about the dredging at Abbot Point is that it will do untold damage to the Great Barrier Reef.  This is totally untrue.  There is no scientific evidence that dredging can or ever will cause damage to the reef.  Yes, there will be short term impacts, mainly from turbidity of the water while the sediments settle.  Most impacts will not go any further than 10 kilometres from the dredged site. A lot of scaremongering from Green groups have stated that the effects will be felt for up to 80 kilometres away. This is simply not true and is just one of the many myths that are circulating.

The Great Barrier Reef has lost half its coral cover in the last 27 years. The loss was due to storm damage (48%), crown of thorns starfish (42%), and bleaching (10%) according to a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences today by researchers from the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) in Townsville and the University of Wollongong.
No mention anywhere on the AIMS website stating that dredging has ever caused any damage to the reef. Isn't it amazing how the green groups have spread lies saying just that!!


 http://www.aims.gov.au/latest-news/-/asset_publisher/MlU7/content/2-october-2012-the-great-barrier-reef-has-lost-half-of-its-coral-in-the-last-27-years 



Environmental advocates believe the enormous scale of the dredging could put the Reef's health at risk. (It is only 3 million cubic metres)
The state-owned North Queensland Bulk Ports is confident they are wrong. It led a similar project in 2006 to expand the Hay Point terminal south of Mackay.
It shifted 8.6million cubic metres of seabed into the marine park, and NQBP chief executive Brad Fish said it was done with scarcely a peep from green groups.
"We received very little, if any, response from the various environmental groups," Mr Fish said.
At Abbot Point, the sandy material will be taken from the coastline then moved to a "like-for-like" area. From start to finish, it will remain at least 40km from the nearest reef.
Mr Fish said there would be impacts from the operation, but these would be short-term. Mainly from cloudiness of the water, caused by the movement of sand.
Mr Fish said those fighting hardest against the dredging were not trying to protect the environment; they wanted to destroy the coal industry. "It's much easier to put your energy into stopping a coal port, which might then stop five mines, than by fighting five mines individually," he said.





 Despite half a century of reef “experts” chanting a continuous litany of imminent threats to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) none has proved to be other than trivial or temporary. The threat de jour is dredging in connection with port developments for the gas and mining industries.  Is this one any more real than the previous non-events, or is it just another grab for public attention and funding by the reef salvation industry?


Environmentalists and the Australian Greens Party are waging a massive campaign, opposing the expansion of Queensland's "Abbot Point" coal-terminal. In so doing they have created a lot of hysteria in the media. The Greens propaganda is always full of dire predictions and catastrophic events.
Their opening statements always start with "the reef is under threat". They falsely claim; the proposed dredging and port expansion will produce an unprecedented amount of spoils, kill all marine life, destroy the coral reef and ruin the Queensland economy in the process: I can assure you, this is not the case.
The Greens and their army of fanatics, have no concept of scale. The nearest coral reef to the dredge site is 40 kilometres away; a fast boat ride would take more than an hour. Imagine trying to swim that distance.





Consistently ignored in most reactions to the federal approval of a modest dredging program at the Abbot Point coal terminal in north Queensland is a landmark raising of the environmental protection bar for the Great Barrier Reef.
The prestigious status of the reef was recognised from the outset by the project proponents, who voluntarily commissioned Australia's most comprehensive Cumulative Impact Assessment process.

http://www.smh.com.au/comment/great-barrier-reef-dredging-is-demonised-by-activists-20131220-2zqpc.html#ixzz31Nxy159p




 “Save the reef” has become a popular catch-cry among many environment groups, with Greenpeace’s Great Barrier Reef website shared more than 125,000 times on social media to date. It and many similar campaigns have focused heavily on “massive dredging, dumping and shipping” for coal and gas ports, particularly the recent Abbot Point dredging decision.
Frequently asked questions:

Is the Great Barrier Reef being dredged for shipping??
No

Is dredge sediment being dumped on reef or seagrass??
No

How far is Abbot Point Coal terminal from the reef??
40 kilometres

What is dredging??
Dredging is an excavation activity to deepen and widen harbours and waterway channels. Safe and navigable waterways are essential for modern and economically competitive ports for the import and export of goods. Dredge material is thoroughly screened for contamination before being approved for carefully considered placement, usually in the marine environment.  

Why do we need to dredge??
We need dredging to:


maintain safe depths in channels, berths and swinging basin within a harbour to allow efficient shipping to occur (maintenance dredging). This is because natural processes such as river discharges, waves and currents transport sediments into the channels and berths
create new areas of a harbour to facilitate import and export needs of Australia’s growing population.

 What are the most serious threats to the reef??
The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority identified the greatest threats to the GBR World Heritage Area as climate change, catchment runoff, coastal development and overfishing/illegal fishing. Neither an increase in shipping traffic nor port dredging has been scientifically recorded as contributing to coral cover loss or a historical decline in the environmental health of the GBR.






Where does dredge material go??
Dredged material relocation is highly regulated and requires extensive analysis of alternatives in accordance with international protocols and Commonwealth legislation. Material for ocean placement is tested under rigorous requirements set out by the National Australian Guidelines for Dredging, using accredited laboratories for the analysis of the material.

Under these and other strict environmental standards, dredging has been conducted successfully in the GBR for decades with minimal impact on the marine environment.


Is there any need to dredge on or near the reef??
There is no need to dredge in or near the outer reef and lagoon areas of the GBR Marine Park and World Heritage Area. In the designated shipping areas the water depths and natural channels are sufficient to enable shipping to occur without the need for dredging.

Why are Queensland's ports important??
Almost all Australia's goods are imported or exported via ship, which make us heavily reliant on efficient ports to send our agricultural and mineral commodities to the world and import food, vehicles and fuel. Exports through ports alongside the Great Barrier Reef were worth $40 billion in 2011-12, representing 78 percent of Queensland’s total export volume.

Can Queensland ports and the Great Barrier Reef co-exist??
Yes. Commercial shipping has been occurring in the GBR area for around 100 years, with shipping safety standards that are among the best in the world. All port activities, developments and shipping within the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area are monitored and managed in accordance with Queensland and federal government laws.

 

AN OPEN LETTER TO ALL CONCERNED

HELP SUPPORT INDUSTRY AND FUTURE JOB PROSPECTS

We are asking for all Australian residents who are concerned for their future job prospects to please take the time to look and see what is happening in our area right now!!

If you have not seen this document before, please take the time to read it.

Stopping the Australian Coal Export Boom - Funding proposal for the Australian anti-coal movement
http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/1206_greenpeace.pdf

‘The activists’ stated objective is to shut down Australia's export coal and gas industries,’
The Battle of Galilee is happening right now.

What this looks like: The coal ports at Abbot Point and Dudgeon Point are both next to the World Heritage listed Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and there are strong opportunities for alliance building with scientists and industries that think that they will be negatively impacted (fishing, tourism, etc).
The Great Barrier Reef is a convenient and emotional leverage for the campaign.
http://www.noosanews.com.au/news/speaking-out-on-great-barrier-reef-scare-mongering/2233337/

Activists are ignoring the scientific evidence and blatantly peddling the line to Australian and international audiences that port developments, dredging and shipping are endangering the reef.
There is no dredging of coral reefs or seagrass and no disposal of dredge spoil on coral reefs, seagrass or other environmentally sensitive areas.
Neither an increase in shipping traffic nor port dredging has been scientifically recorded as contributing to coral cover loss or a historical decline in the environmental health of the Great Barrier Reef.
The scientific work into the ongoing environmental management of the Great Barrier Reef is no secret, and that is why we are asking Australians to learn more from the Queensland Government’s Reef Facts website.


The residents of Bowen are fighting back against this anti coal campaign.
If you would like to help us, please join the facebook group, Bowen and Surrounds Needs and Wants the Abbot Point Expansion https://www.facebook.com/groups/AbbotPointExpansionSupporters/

Regards,
Members of The Abbot Point Expansion Supporters Group